This LABSTAT is the fourth of a series focusing on data coherence between employment and gross domestic product (GDP). This issue examines the connection between output and employment at the regional level and how this relates with labor market outcomes.
Regional Comparisons
A comparative analysis of regional employment and gross regional domestic product (GRDP) data is another approach for validating the coherence between the two data sets. It is also useful in examining the link between output and employment and how these affect regional labor market outcomes across regional groupings.
The regional distribution of GRDP is seen to be highly uneven and heavily biased towards few developed regions. As shown in Figure 4, about one-third (31.9%) of the nation’s output in 2005 was produced in NCR which accounted for just one-eight (12.7%) of the total employed workforce (Figure 5). This is in sharp contrast with the twelve regions that collectively accounted for one-half (50.0%) of total employed, but together produced only a little less than one-third (32.8%) of GDP. In between these extremes were the four (4) moderately developed regions comprised of Region IV-A, Region III, Region VI and Region VII, which collectively accounted for 35.3% of GDP and 37.3% of employment.